Thumbnail5:30 SCALAR ACTIVITY. PLUS POSSIBLE TORNADO FOR HOUSTON AREA 29TH SEPTEMBER 2011

ORICA. HIGH LEVELS OF MERCURY LEAKS INTO THE AIR. AUSTRALIA SEPTEMBER 28 2011

How is a company like Orica able to get away with this.

Rain Making Machine Willunga. South Australia

This site is no longer in use tho it could be again in the future.

The structures emit a dense field of negative ions into the atmosphere using high-voltage electricity, and are meant to create clouds that in turn produce rain.RC is owned by Sydney multi-millionaire and nephew of Rupert Murdoch, Matt Handbury and wife Clare and the company attracted some notoriety last year when former Liberal Environment Minister Malcolm Turnbull awarded ARC a $10 million grant to trial the rain-making technology, a month before the Federal Election.

Another strange sky in Adelaide

My reply email from Air Traffic control. Regarding a chemtrail.

I will start by showing some of the photos taken on the day.

To let you know we do live on a flight parth for all commercial aircraft coming into Adelaide. Also daily we have commercial aircraft like " Qantas" flying from Melbourne " East" to Perth "West" at a average height of 35,000 feet..

The following is a email I received from Airservices Australia who are a Governing corporation that handle all Air Traffic control in Australia.

I wrote to them enquiring information on a chemtrail that we [ Wife ] saw on 15 September 2010 being dumped right over us. The plane was spotted coming from a Westerly direction and heading S/E direction flying a low altitude.

The chemtrail lasted in the sky for around 3hrs while spreading a finally covering the sky in a grey mist.

Dear Mr B.........

Thank you for your inquiry. Please accept my apologies for the delays in responding.

Aircraft regularly overfly Adelaide at high altitudes and at times may leave 'contrails' as described. Depending on atmospheric conditions, these can last for a few seconds or minutes, or be visible for several hours.

[ Gary ] I have never seen a contrail last for several hours !!. 

While we are not able to identify the particular aircraft responsible for the contrail you witnessed on 15 September based on the information provided, the flight route described is not unusual.

[ Gary ]  “Not able to identify the particular aircraft”. According to your web site you handle all Air Traffic control. Which means according to my understanding you should be able to identify all aircraft in the air space.

International flights between Perth and destinations in South-East Asia may overfly Adelaide as airlines look to take advantage of favourable winds at high levels before turning north.

 “Airlines look to take advantage of favourable winds at high levels before turning north”

[ Gary ] Why would you fly from Perth head s/e past Adelaide do a u-turn fly North if you were heading for South East Asia with no stops in between.

In addition, some long haul flights between the Middle East and airports on the Australian east coast also fly over Adelaide.

These flights occur on a daily basis, but in most conditions would be invisible to an observer on the ground due to the height at which the aircraft is flying.

I trust this information assists with your inquiry.

Regards

Matt Wardell Senior Adviser External Communication Corporate and International Affairs.

Top scientist resigns from post – admits Global Warming is a scam

As reported by the Gateway Pundit:  Top US scientist Hal Lewis resigned this week from his post at the University of California at Santa Barbara.  He admitted global warming climate change was nothing but a scam in his resignation letter.

From the Telegraph (because for some reason the Liberal Media here in the U.S don’t like this stuff getting out).

The following is a letter to the American Physical Society released to the public by Professor Emeritus of physics Hal Lewis of the University of California at Santa Barbara.

Sent: Friday, 08 October 2010 17:19 Hal Lewis From: Hal Lewis, University of California, Santa Barbara To: Curtis G. Callan, Jr., Princeton University, President of the American Physical Society 6 October 2010

Dear Curt:

When I first joined the American Physical Society sixty-seven years ago it was much smaller, much gentler, and as yet uncorrupted by the money flood (a threat against which Dwight Eisenhower warned a half-century ago).

Indeed, the choice of physics as a profession was then a guarantor of a life of poverty and abstinence—it was World War II that changed all that. The prospect of worldly gain drove few physicists. As recently as thirty-five years ago, when I chaired the first APS study of a contentious social/scientific issue, The Reactor Safety Study, though there were zealots aplenty on the outside there was no hint of inordinate pressure on us as physicists. We were therefore able to produce what I believe was and is an honest appraisal of the situation at that time. We were further enabled by the presence of an oversight committee consisting of Pief Panofsky, Vicki Weisskopf, and Hans Bethe, all towering physicists beyond reproach. I was proud of what we did in a charged atmosphere. In the end the oversight committee, in its report to the APS President, noted the complete independence in which we did the job, and predicted that the report would be attacked from both sides. What greater tribute could there be?

How different it is now. The giants no longer walk the earth, and the money flood has become the raison d’être of much physics research, the vital sustenance of much more, and it provides the support for untold numbers of professional jobs. For reasons that will soon become clear my former pride at being an APS Fellow all these years has been turned into shame, and I am forced, with no pleasure at all, to offer you my resignation from the Society.

It is of course, the global warming scam, with the (literally) trillions of dollars driving it, that has corrupted so many scientists, and has carried APS before it like a rogue wave. It is the greatest and most successful pseudoscientific fraud I have seen in my long life as a physicist. Anyone who has the faintest doubt that this is so should force himself to read the ClimateGate documents, which lay it bare. (Montford’s book organizes the facts very well.) I don’t believe that any real physicist, nay scientist, can read that stuff without revulsion. I would almost make that revulsion a definition of the word scientist.

So what has the APS, as an organization, done in the face of this challenge? It has accepted the corruption as the norm, and gone along with it…



§ 1520a. Restrictions on use of human subjects for testing of chemical or biological agents

(a) Prohibited activities

The Secretary of Defense may not conduct (directly or by contract)—

(1) any test or experiment involving the use of a chemical agent or biological agent on a civilian population; or

(2) any other testing of a chemical agent or biological agent on human subjects.

(b) Exceptions

Subject to subsections (c), (d), and (e) of this section, the prohibition in subsection (a) of this section does not apply to a test or experiment carried out for any of the following purposes:

(1) Any peaceful purpose that is related to a medical, therapeutic, pharmaceutical, agricultural, industrial, or research activity.

(2) Any purpose that is directly related to protection against toxic chemicals or biological weapons and agents.

(3) Any law enforcement purpose, including any purpose related to riot control.

(c) Informed consent required

The Secretary of Defense may conduct a test or experiment described in subsection (b) of this section only if informed consent to the testing was obtained from each human subject in advance of the testing on that subject.

(d) Prior notice to Congress

Not later than 30 days after the date of final approval within the Department of Defense of plans for any experiment or study to be conducted by the Department of Defense (whether directly or under contract) involving the use of human subjects for the testing of a chemical agent or a biological agent, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives a report setting forth a full accounting of those plans, and the experiment or study may then be conducted only after the end of the 30-day period beginning on the date such report is received by those committees.

(e) “Biological agent” defined

In this section, the term “biological agent” means any micro-organism (including bacteria, viruses, fungi, rickettsiac, or protozoa), pathogen, or infectious substance, and any naturally occurring, bioengineered, or synthesized component of any such micro-organism, pathogen, or infectious substance, whatever its origin or method of production, that is capable of causing—

(1) death, disease, or other biological malfunction in a human, an animal, a plant, or another living organism;

(2) deterioration of food, water, equipment, supplies, or materials of any kind; or

(3) deleterious alteration of the environment.